User-Controlled Wallets vs Non-Custodial WaaS vs Magic
Build an ecosystem optimized for your goals while opening up new revenue streams.
Comparison Summary
User-Controlled Wallets, Non-Custodial WaaS and Magic each address unique challenges in the web3 ecosystem, offering complementary strengths for builders. A frontend sample app demonstrating integration of Circle's Web3 Services user-controlled wallets with gasless transactions. Fireblocks Non-Custodial Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) provides a comprehensive API platform to securely manage, transfer, and issue digital assets across vaults, wallets, exchanges, and fiat accounts. Magic provides enterprise-grade, non-custodial wallet infrastructure and passwordless authentication APIs for seamless Web3 onboarding and wallet management. Together, these tools serve different but overlapping user needs, making them valuable components in a modern web3 development stack.
| At a Glance | |||
| Composability | |||
| Cross-Chain | |||
| Customizability | |||
| Developer Support | |||
| Ease of Integration | |||
| Performance | |||
| Key Features | |||
| Core Capabilities | Next.js and React-based UI, SDK integration with App ID and user tokens, PIN recovery and challenge execution | Transaction Lifecycle Management, AML/KYT Integration, Webhook Event Notifications | API Wallets with Core and Express APIs, Embedded Wallet SDKs, Multi-chain support, Newton Protocol |
| Chain Support | +27 | +32 | |
| Best For | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers | Infrastructure Developers, Financial Institutions | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers |
| Pricing | |||
| Free Tier | Free | Custom Enterprise Pricing | Free |
| Paid Features | — | — | 1 paid tiers |
| Custom Plans | — | Enterprise plans | Enterprise plans |
Add a related tool
Related Tools
Explore web3 competitors and apps like User-Controlled Wallets.
