UMA vs Non-Custodial WaaS vs Multichain
Build an ecosystem optimized for your goals while opening up new revenue streams.
Comparison Summary
UMA, Non-Custodial WaaS and Multichain each address unique challenges in the web3 ecosystem, offering complementary strengths for builders. UMA is a decentralized optimistic oracle that trustlessly records any verifiable data on blockchain to enable secure onchain truth for DeFi and Web3 applications. Fireblocks Non-Custodial Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) provides a comprehensive API platform to securely manage, transfer, and issue digital assets across vaults, wallets, exchanges, and fiat accounts. An open source platform for creating and deploying private blockchains with Bitcoin compatibility. Together, these tools serve different but overlapping user needs, making them valuable components in a modern web3 development stack.
| At a Glance | |||
| Composability | |||
| Cross-Chain | |||
| Customizability | |||
| Developer Support | |||
| Ease of Integration | |||
| Performance | |||
| Key Features | |||
| Core Capabilities | Bonded Data Proposals, Challenge Period, Voter Rewards | Transaction Lifecycle Management, AML/KYT Integration, Webhook Event Notifications | Rapid Deployment, Native Assets and Data Streams, Permission Management |
| Chain Support | — | +27 | +19 |
| Best For | DeFi Developers, Infrastructure Developers | Infrastructure Developers, Financial Institutions | Infrastructure Developers, Enterprise Blockchain Teams |
| Pricing | |||
| Free Tier | Free | Custom Enterprise Pricing | Open Source |
| Paid Features | — | — | — |
| Custom Plans | — | Enterprise plans | — |
Add a related tool
Related Tools
Explore web3 competitors and apps like UMA.
