Wallet as a Service vs Magic vs Trust Wallet
Build an ecosystem optimized for your goals while opening up new revenue streams.
Comparison Summary
Wallet as a Service, Magic and Trust Wallet each address unique challenges in the web3 ecosystem, offering complementary strengths for builders. Wallet as a Service provides a turnkey solution for integrating blockchain wallets into applications with minimal development effort. Magic provides enterprise-grade, non-custodial wallet infrastructure and passwordless authentication APIs for seamless Web3 onboarding and wallet management. A decentralized mobile and browser extension wallet enabling true crypto ownership and seamless Web3 experiences. Together, these tools serve different but overlapping user needs, making them valuable components in a modern web3 development stack.
| At a Glance | |||
| Composability | |||
| Cross-Chain | |||
| Customizability | |||
| Developer Support | |||
| Ease of Integration | |||
| Performance | |||
| Key Features | |||
| Core Capabilities | Multi-Chain Support, User Account Abstraction, Transaction Signing and Management | API Wallets with Core and Express APIs, Embedded Wallet SDKs, Multi-chain support, Newton Protocol | Wallet Core SDK, Deep Linking and WalletConnect, Asset and dApp Listing |
| Chain Support | +32 | +5 | |
| Best For | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers | DeFi Developers, Infrastructure Developers |
| Pricing | |||
| Free Tier | Starter | Free | Free |
| Paid Features | 1 paid tiers | 1 paid tiers | — |
| Custom Plans | — | Enterprise plans | — |
Add a related tool
Related Tools
Explore web3 competitors and apps like Wallet as a Service.
Wallet Connector
Wallet Connect
Embedded Wallet
