ENS vs World Chain vs Fractal Account
Build an ecosystem optimized for your goals while opening up new revenue streams.
Comparison Summary
ENS, World Chain and Fractal Account each address unique challenges in the web3 ecosystem, offering complementary strengths for builders. Ethereum Name Service (ENS) provides decentralized, human-readable names for Ethereum addresses and other resources, simplifying blockchain interactions. A blockchain designed for humans that prioritizes scalability, accessibility, and Sybil resistance through World ID verification. Fractal is a decentralized identity platform focused on privacy-preserving user authentication and data ownership. Together, these tools serve different but overlapping user needs, making them valuable components in a modern web3 development stack.
| At a Glance | |||
| Composability | |||
| Cross-Chain | |||
| Customizability | |||
| Developer Support | |||
| Ease of Integration | |||
| Performance | |||
| Key Features | |||
| Core Capabilities | Human-Readable Names, Text Records and Avatars, Public Resolver and Custom Resolvers | World ID Integration, Built on the Superchain, Token Airdrops to Verified Humans | Decentralized identity creation and management, Interoperability with identity standards, SDKs and APIs for easy integration |
| Chain Support | +1 | ||
| Best For | NFT Platform Developers, Infrastructure Developers | Identity/Social Developers, DeFi Developers | Identity/Social Developers, Enterprise Blockchain Teams |
| Pricing | |||
| Free Tier | Standard | Default | — |
| Paid Features | — | — | — |
| Custom Plans | — | — | — |
Add a related tool
Related Tools
Explore web3 competitors and apps like ENS.
Solana Name Service
Passport
Web3 Growth Suite
Sunrise DA
Internet Computer
