Zora vs Magic vs Subgraphs
Build an ecosystem optimized for your goals while opening up new revenue streams.
Comparison Summary
Zora, Magic and Subgraphs each address unique challenges in the web3 ecosystem, offering complementary strengths for builders. A social network where every post is a coin, enabling creators to mint and trade unique digital assets. Magic provides enterprise-grade, non-custodial wallet infrastructure and passwordless authentication APIs for seamless Web3 onboarding and wallet management. The Graph is a decentralized indexing protocol that organizes blockchain data and makes it easily accessible via GraphQL. Together, these tools serve different but overlapping user needs, making them valuable components in a modern web3 development stack.
| At a Glance | |||
| Composability | |||
| Cross-Chain | |||
| Customizability | |||
| Developer Support | |||
| Ease of Integration | |||
| Performance | |||
| Key Features | |||
| Core Capabilities | Coins SDK, Coins Protocol, Query APIs | API Wallets with Core and Express APIs, Embedded Wallet SDKs, Multi-chain support, Newton Protocol | Subgraphs, Substreams, Token API |
| Chain Support | — | +32 | +46 |
| Best For | NFT Platform Developers, DeFi Developers | Infrastructure Developers, DeFi Developers | DeFi Developers, NFT Platform Developers |
| Pricing | |||
| Free Tier | Free | Free | Hosted Service |
| Paid Features | — | 1 paid tiers | 1 paid tiers |
| Custom Plans | — | Enterprise plans | — |
Add a related tool
Related Tools
Explore web3 competitors and apps like Zora.
